AI Overviews Research: Analyzing sources in Google’s AI-generated answers 

Google AI Overviews are dynamic. This makes estimating traffic and predicting conversions difficult for SEO specialists, website owners, and businesses. Our purpose for these studies is to help you keep your finger on the pulse of AI-powered search trends and make informed decisions. How do we do it? By providing you with relevant data and insights you can use.

In fact, our SGE study in February and our AIO pre vs. post-rollout comparison in June 2024 revealed some important insights into basic AIO behavior. We’re digging much deeper this time. 

Now we are focusing on the sources used by AI Overviews. This will help us better understand who Google prioritizes in its AI-generated answers. Consider using this information to come up with ways to optimize your content better while maintaining your visibility in the new search results. Also, in this study, we used accounts without Google Labs to give a more realistic view of how AIOs function for ordinary users.

The SE Ranking team is now preparing to launch its unique AI Overviews Tracking Tool designed to help users better understand the new GenAI era of search. You can join the waitlist now to be among the first to experience SE Ranking’s innovative tool. In the meantime, SE Ranking brings valuable studies to the industry using this solution and the data it provides.

Now, let’s look at what we’ve discovered and what it means for your SEO strategy moving forward.

TL;DR:

Disclaimer:

Our latest findings on the sources used by AI Overviews are based on the data we collected using the SE Ranking platform. This is our interpretation of the results. We acknowledge that other valid interpretations may exist. 

Niche-specific findings are heavily influenced by the keywords selected for our study. Also, you may encounter AIOs linking to different websites within that niche depending on the query used.

Find out more about how we conducted this research by reading the Methodology section at the end of this article.

How have AI Overviews changed since our previous research?

Before analyzing links in Google’s AIOs, let’s briefly recap the changes in AI-powered response behavior since our last research. We’ll compare the results by using the 100,013 search queries we selected for analysis.

How has the frequency of AIO appearance in search changed?

Our latest research shows a slight decrease of 1.24% in AI Overview appearances compared to our previous study. In our earlier research, 8.71% of searches (8,718 keywords) triggered AIOs. This time, AI Overviews showed up for only 7.47% of searches (7,475 keywords). 

92,440 keywords (92.43%) didn’t end with AIOs, and a minor 98 keywords (0.10%) resulted in a technical error where Google couldn’t generate an AI response.

As for the keyword overlap between these two studies, we found out that 88,329 (88.32%) keywords didn’t trigger AIOs in either period, and 11,684 (11.68%) triggered AIOs in at least one period. 

Out of them:

• 2,966 keywords (25.39%) triggered AIOs in the new study only.
• 4,509 keywords (38.59%) triggered AIOs in both periods.
• 4,209 keywords (36.02%) triggered AIOs in the previous study only.

How has the AI Overview average text length changed?

According to the data in our latest study, the average AIO text length is 2,633 characters. In our previous study, that value was 4,342 characters. That’s a decrease of about 39%.

Additionally, the average AIO text length in words is about 397 words per AI-powered answer in search.

How has the distribution of AI Overviews changed across different niches?

Our most recent findings reveal some interesting shifts in how different niches trigger AIOs. After analyzing 20 niches, with each being represented by around 5,000 keywords, and then comparing this data, we can see that:

• The Relationships niche still dominates, jumping from 26.62% to 40.64% of keywords triggering AIOs.
• The Food and Beverage niche holds steady, maintaining its second-place position with a slight decrease from 24.78% to 23.58%.
• The Business and Technology niches have swapped places with the Business niche moving up to third (from 16.88% to 18.48%) and the Technology niche slipping to fourth (from 18.11% to 17.17%).
• The Self-Care and Wellness niche is a new entrant to the top five (15.66%), replacing the Pets niche (1.04%).
• The Fashion and Beauty, Pets, and Ecommerce and Retail niches saw a significant decline from 15.26%, 15.58%, and 12.18% to 0.24%, 1.04%, and 0.28%, respectively. Note that these three niches had the most keywords with commercial search intent, making this quite an interesting drop in the number of AIOs. It merits further analysis.

Niches that triggered less than 1% of AIOs have held steady onto their previous positions:

• The Legal (0.64%), Healthcare (0.56%), Career and Jobs (0.32%), News and Politics (0.68%), Cars (0.24%), and Real Estate (0.14%) niches continue to have low AIO trigger rates.
• The Travel niche has gained ground, moving from less than 1% to 1.32%.

How has the interplay between featured snippets and AI Overviews changed?

AIOs and featured snippets are appearing together more frequently. Previously, they co-occurred 45.39% of the time (3,957 out of 8,718 cases), but now AIOs and featured snippets accompany each other 63.67% of the time (4,759 out of 7,475 cases).

When AIOs aren’t present, featured snippets have become less common, dropping from 8.61% (7,856 out of 91,295 keywords) to 6.04% (5,585 out of 92,538 keywords). 

The number of instances featuring a link match between an AIO and a featured snippet has increased slightly, from 61.79% (2,445 out of 3,957 instances) to 63.63% (3,028 out of 4,759 instances).

Do long-tail queries with low search volume and low CPC still trigger the most AIOs?

Our new analysis continues to reveal obvious patterns in keyword types most likely to trigger AIOs. Several of our research studies show the same AIO behavior, indicating a consistent pattern.

• Ten-word queries have seen a significant jump in their ability to trigger AIOs, from 19.10% previously to 32.02% now.
• Low-volume keywords are still strong triggers for AIOs. Keywords with search volumes from 0 to 50 previously triggered AIOs 33.21% of the time. This trend has grown. This keyword type currently triggers AIOs 38.06% of the time.
• Lower CPC keywords are even more likely to trigger AIOs now. Previously, queries with CPC from $0 to $0.5 resulted in AIOs 53.65% of the time. They currently trigger AIOs 60.67% of the time.

Let’s move on to the core topic of our research, analyzing resources in AI Overviews.

How many sources do AI Overviews feature?

We focused on the number of sources (links) that users can see before expanding the AIO through the Show More button (pre-click links) and after expanding (post-click links).

The maximum number of pre-click links is 10 links (19 links previously), while the most frequently occurring number of pre-click links has remained the same, 1 link.

The highest number of post-click links is 13 links (26 links previously), and the most frequently occurring number of post-click links is 9 links (4 links previously).

What’s the average number of pre and post-click links across different niches?

The average number of pre-click links across researched niches is 2.5 links (a slight increase compared to the previous result of 2.2 links). The average number of post-click links is 7.2 links (a bigger increase, from 5.5 links previously).

Since our previous analysis, the leaders in the average number of pre-click links changed from Healthcare (3.14 links), Legal (3.12 links), and Finance (3.12 links) to: 

• Real Estate (3.71 links)
• Insurance (3.05 links)
• Ecommerce and Retail (3 links) 

The leader of the biggest average number of post-click links also changed from Travel (7.30 links) to Education (8.15 links). The top 2 and top 3 spots switched from Relationships (7.06 links) and Sports and Exercise (6.94 links) previously to Sports and Exercise (8.08 links) and Relationships (8.00 links) now.

What are the top-linked websites in AI Overviews?

The top 5 linked websites are:

• Youtube.com (linked 1,346 times)
• Linkedin.com (linked 1,091 times)
• Healthline.com (linked 1,091 times)
• Verywellmind.com (linked 855 times)
• Forbes.com (linked 804 times)

After checking the 20 top-linked websites with SE Ranking, we identified that: 

• According to our Backlink Checker, they have between 24K to 24.10M referring domains and between 247K to 38.50B backlinks. However, there is an exception here—gov.au. We detected only 196 referring domains and 643 backlinks on this website.
• According to our Competitive Research Tool, they have between 531K to 1.07B organic keywords and 213K to 8.14B organic traffic. 
• According to our Website Audit Tool, these top-linked websites were created between 1985 and 2017, with an average age of around 25 years. Two domains were established in 1985 and 1986, 9 were created between 1990-1999, 2 domains were founded in 2001-2005, and 2 newer websites were launched in 2012 (coursera.org) and 2017 (verywellmind.com). There were also 3 domains we couldn’t get data for.

To review the distribution by niches, check out this file. It contains a list of the top 10 linked websites in each sector, with details on organic keywords, traffic, backlinks, referring domains, and more.

Anastasia Kotsiubynska

Head of SEO at SE Ranking

We see major platforms dominating as sources for AIOs. This proves again that Google prefers authoritative, trusted platforms with robust backlink profiles. The creation dates for these top-linked domains, ranging from 1985 to 2005, indicate their long-standing presence. Older domains often accumulate authority over time, which can be a significant factor in both SEO and the domain’s chances of being referenced in AIOs. However, younger sites like verywellmind.com, created in 2017, can be considered a credible source by Google. This website has 186К referring domains, 2M backlinks, 7.4M organic keywords, and 17.7M estimated monthly organic traffic, making it a large, visible, and reliable source.

Do AI Overviews pull domains from the TOP 10 organic search results?

Out of the 7,475 cases where SERPs included an AI Overview, there were 7,002 instances (93.67%) where AIOs linked to at least one domain from the top 10 organic search results.

Important note! This section focuses on domains, not links. You’ll find more detailed information on link intersection in the following sections. 

In 473 cases (6.33%), AIOs did not overlap with any of the top 10 organic domains.

Here is our list of the top 20 most frequent domains appearing in the top 10 organic search results and AIOs simultaneously:

If you are interested in the distribution by niches, check out this file.

Anastasia Kotsiubynska

Head of SEO at SE Ranking

A significant overlap between domains featured in AIOs and domains appearing in the top 10 organic search results indicates that Google heavily favors domains that already perform well organically when choosing sources for AIOs. However, domains outside the top 10 can still get featured if they offer unique content or have niche relevance. The list of domains frequently appearing in both AIOs and top 10 results—like Healthline, Forbes, and WebMD—underscores the importance of domain authority and trustworthiness. Google likely perceives these domains as reputable information sources. This indicates that you should focus on establishing your domain as a credible source in your niche while improving its E-E-A-T signals.

Do AI Overview sources match pages ranking in the TOP 1-100 of organic search?

During our research, we collected 51,745 links from AI Overviews. A total of 29,234 links from AIOs (56.50%) matched the top 1-100 search results for keywords they rank for, with most linking to the top 1-10 search results. Also, 22,511 links (43.50%) matched sources outside the top 100 search results.

The chart below shows the distribution of the 29,234 links that matched the top 1-100 pages:

When broken down by specific niches, the data reveals how different sectors are represented within AI Overviews. However, this data strongly depends on the total number of AIOs and links present in each niche.

Below are the top 5 niches with the most matched links from the top 1-30 organic search results:

• Relationships: 6,381 links (43.38% of its total links)
• Food and Beverage: 4,895 links (64.73% of its total links)
• Technology: 3,003 links (50.87% of its total links)
• Business: 2,814 links (41.89% of its total links)
• Self-Care and Wellness: 2,572 links (47.18% of its total links)

The Real Estate, Cars, and Fashion and Beauty niches have the lowest number of matched links from the top 30 organic results (21, 28, and 30 links, respectively). Since these niches have few AIOs in general, this is a fairly straightforward result.

Niches with strong linkage outside of the top 10 include: 

• Relationships: 1,394 links in the top 11-30 (21.8% of its total links)
• Sports and Exercise: 330 links in the top 11-30 (17.8% of its total)
• Self-Care and Wellness: 347 links in the top 11-30 (13.5% of its total)
• Food and Beverage: 586 links in positions 11-30 (12% of its total)

The Ecommerce and Retail niche shows a drop, with zero links outside the top 20 results.

The Healthcare, Legal, and News and Politics niches have a low but consistent linkage.

While Google prefers to reference high-ranking pages in AI Overviews, plenty of discovered links (43.50%) come from sources outside the top 100, specifically for keywords where those links were present on AIOs. This suggests that Google also values unique and highly relevant content that may not necessarily rank high for an entered query (due to competition, lower domain authority, or other factors). Google also appears to prefer content that ranks for other keywords related to the topic of the original search query.

Bogdan Babyak

CMO at SE Ranking

The Generative summaries for search results patent explains that Google begins by creating the initial summary and then adding links that verify the content. When creating AIO text, Google analyzes search result document positions, selection rate, and other factors and if the analyzed documents aren’t “diverse relative to one another, being of low quality, and/or having other characteristic(s)”, it will check search result documents from related queries. Google’s system can also analyze search results for relevant recent search queries and implied queries. This could explain why Google occasionally refers to content that doesn’t rank in the top 100 for those search queries in AIOs. Google can take it from different SERPs and the question here is how those related search documents rank in those SERPs. Our assumption is that most likely they also rank in the top 10 or close to the top 10 in related SERPs. After this, Google selects the best sources to verify the information with. Google looks for the most relevant top search results, but it can also limit how deep it goes to find and select documents.

This all suggests that Google values diversity and wants to cover different perspectives. It accomplishes this by occasionally selecting sources that aren’t ranking high or don’t rank at all for a specific keyword, the source instead ranking for queries related to the topic. Google might choose these sources because they provide unique information despite being narrowly reported. These sources could also be more relevant to a specific aspect of a query. This underlines the importance of diversifying content to cover related topics and questions that users might also be interested in.

The frequency of keywords resulting in link matches between AI Overviews and the TOP 10 search results

Most keywords (about 72%) trigger AIOs with 1-4 links matching the top 10 organic search results.

Here is a detailed breakdown of our research. It shows the total number of keywords that triggered AIOs (7,475):

As you can see, the frequency of keywords triggering AIOs with matching links decreases as the number of matched links increases. For instance, while 1,528 keywords had one link that matched the top 10 results, only 17 keywords had eight matched links. There were 747 keywords with no matches from the top 10 search results.

We also looked at how many keywords result in a full link match. Let’s look at this question from two sides:

• Links in the AIO matching all links in the top 10 organic search results
• Links in the top 10 organic results matching all links in the AIO

As you can see from the table, there were 19 cases (keywords) where one link from the top 10 search results matched one link in AIO. In this case, the AIO only contained one link, which is considered a full match.

There was only one instance where links in the AIO matched all links from the top 10 organic search results (6 links, in that particular case). It was for the is soy in milk keyword. Also, 1 keyword (website development meaning) resulted in the top 10 search results that matched all 9 links referenced by the AIO.

We collected this data on July 11, but the SERP and AIO are so dynamic that we couldn’t get the same results again after analyzing these findings and preparing this article. This underscores how important it is to continually monitor Google’s AI-generated responses and search results pages. This is where SE Ranking’s new AI Overviews Tracking tool can help. Join the waitlist to start tracking AIOs and monitor changes as they occur. 

The most common number of matched links were 5, 6, and 4 links.

What do top links in AI Overviews have in common?

Across our sample of keywords, we examined several links appearing frequently in AI Overviews. Our goal was to understand their metrics, content, and how it was structured. Here are several examples that we’d like to share.

• https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/wellness-and-prevention/9-benefits-of-yoga 

Google has cited this page in AIOs more than 100 times for yoga-related keywords from the Sports and Exercise niche.

Our Competitive Research tool shows that this page ranks first in the United States for the keyword, benefits of yoga (monthly search volume: 1,210). Overall, it has organic visibility for 15.2K keywords, with estimated monthly traffic of 24.4K. The article has 2.5K referring domains and 7.5K backlinks.

The article’s content is structured in a “9 Benefits” format with 9 numbered subsections. It contains 695 words of body content and AI detectors consider the text to be human-written. While the article doesn’t specify an author or publication date, it has detailed structured data for Articles and Organization (check results).

• https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/meditation/in-depth/meditation/art-20045858 

Google referred to this page 100+ times for meditation-related keywords from the Self-Care and Wellness niche.

It ranks first in the US for the benefits of meditation keyword (monthly search volume: 8,100). The page is visible for 24.3K keywords in organic search and its estimated traffic per month is 22.1K. The article has 7.1K referring domains and 17.3K backlinks.

This 1,800-word article contains 5 bulleted lists, including 3 labeled lists (a format that AI content generators often favor). Despite this, the content passes the AI detector check and is marked as human-generated.

The author, specified as Mayo Clinic Staff, published the article on December 14, 2023. There is no schema markup on this page (check results).

• https://www.forbes.com/health/nutrition/soy-milk/ 

Google has cited this article over 100 times for soy milk-related keywords in the Food and Beverage niche.

It ranks in the top 10 in the US for the soy milk keyword (monthly search volume: 40,500). The page has organic visibility for 3.2K keywords, with 5.8K estimated organic traffic per month. Despite this, the article has only 9 referring domains and 12 backlinks.

The article’s body content word count is 1,591 words, structured into small subsections with 3 headings in question format. The content has been marked as human-generated.

The authorship is attributed to Sarah Hays Coomer (contributor), with fact-checking by Alena Hall (editor). The article was last updated on January 9, 2024.

The page includes Article structured data (check results).

• https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/definition/AI-Artificial-Intelligence 

Google has used this link as a source about 100 times for keywords related to artificial intelligence in the Technology niche.

It ranks in the US’s top 10 for the artificial intelligence keyword (monthly search volume: 165K). The page is visible organically for 10.1K keywords, with monthly traffic forecast of 96.4 clicks. It has 4.4K referring domains and 9.8K backlinks.

It is a comprehensive, 7,329-word guide that is well-structured, broken apart into small subsections. It features numerous question headings, bulleted lists, 2 YouTube videos, infographics, and many links to informational sources. The content has been verified as human-generated.

The article has clearly indicated authors with links to their profiles:

• Lev Craig, Site Editor
• Nicole Laskowski, Senior News Director
• Linda Tucci, Industry Editor — CIO/IT Strategy

George Lawton is also credited as a contributor, but no link to his profile is provided.

The article was last updated in June 2024 and the page includes three types of structured data (check results): Articles, Paywalled Content, and Videos.

LinkedIn links:

• https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/art-building-relationships-strategies-successful-business-kumawat 

This page was cited by Google over 100 times for keywords from the Relationships niche. 

According to our data (SE Ranking data), this page has no referring domains or backlinks and ranks for only two keywords. It contains 396 words and was created on February 25, 2023. If you check the link as a non-logged-in user, there is no information about the author, except for their name.

Two different AI content detectors mark this article as entirely AI-generated.

• https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/10-reasons-why-travel-so-important-build-life-erin-smith-uc9xc 

This LinkedIn article was cited 3 times for keywords from the Travel niche (note that keywords from this niche triggered only 66 AIOs).

The article ranks for 53 keywords in the US, many of which are in the top 10 (for instance, why traveling is important, with a search volume of 590). The page has no referring domains or backlinks.

This article follows a “10 Reasons” format, which is likely why it is frequently sourced in AIOs. With 1,237 words contained in the body text, the content is flagged as 55% AI-generated by one AI detector, while another considers it entirely AI-generated. 

The author is a travel advisor and travel agency owner, Erin Smith. The article was published on March 25, 2024.

Both LinkedIn articles have two types of structured data: Articles and Paywalled Content (first article results, second article results). Both authors have over 1K followers. Google likely considers this significant.

How AI Overviews link to major media or UGC platforms

For this research, we selected 21 websites, including big media and User Generated Content platforms to check how many links from AIOs they get, the niches they appear for, and much more. We divided these websites into two groups.

Media outlets:

• forbes.com
• entrepreneur.com
• businessinsider.com
• inc.com
• mashable.com
• 9to5google.com
• searchenginejournal.com
• techcrunch.com
• searchengineland.com
• theguardian.com
• techradar.com
• wired.com
• theverge.com
• washingtonpost.com
• wsj.com

Forums & Social Media:

• reddit.com
• quora.com
• linkedin.com
• wikipedia.org
• youtube.com
• stackoverflow.com

Important note! This data is highly dependent on the keywords selected for our research, their search intent, and the keywords that triggered the AIOs in general. AIOs typically appear in search results for long-tail search queries with informational intents (what is, how to, etc.). These likely aren’t the typical keywords that media content appears for.

Do the analyzed websites get featured in AI Overviews and how often?

The top 5 frequently mentioned media in AI Overviews are:

• Forbes: 804 links pointing to its website from 723 AIOs.
• Business Insider: 148 links to its website from 139 AIOs.
• Entrepreneur: 45 links to its website from 44 AIOs.
• Inc: 36 links to its website from 36 AIOs.
• The Guardian: 35 links to its website from 35 AIOs.

The table below contains data on all the analyzed media outlets with their AIO and link counts:

As for the Forums & Social Media group, we can see that the following platforms are leading:

• YouTube: 1,346 links from 946 AIOs.
• LinkedIn: 1,091 links from 905 AIOs.
• Wikipedia: 726 links from 635 AIOs.

The table below contains data on AIO and link counts for all the analyzed Forums & Social Media websites:

Reddit and Quora rarely appear in AI-generated responses, even though Google bought Reddit’s users’ content to train its AI. According to our research, none of the 100,013 analyzed keywords generated AIOs with links to Reddit and Quora. Here is how the number of links to these sites evolved across our three studies:

It looks like Google reduced Reddit and Quora’s occurrence in AIOs, probably to improve the quality of its answers, especially after numerous cases of hallucinations.

As for websites that fall into several niches, the media group is led by:

• Forbes.com (15 niches out of 20). Forbes dominates in several niches, in particular Business (162 AIOs, 228 links), Finance (151 AIOs, 158 links), and Food and Beverage (157 AIOs, 157 links).
• Business Insider (9 niches out of 20). Business Insider has a high number of AIOs and links in the Relationships (73 AIOs, 81 links), Self-Care and Wellness (24 AIOs, 24 links), and Finance (18 AIOs, 18 links) niches.
• Mashable (8 niches out of 20): Mashable leads in the Sports and Exercise (6 AIOs, 6 links), Education (2 AIOs, 2 links), and Relationships (2 AIOs, 2 links) niches.
• The Guardian (8 niches out of 20): The Guardian’s top niches are Relationships (13 AIOs, 13 links), Self-Care and Wellness (6 AIOs, 6 links), and Food and Beverage (5 AIOs, 5 links).
• Entrepreneur (7 niches out of 20): Entrepreneur appears mostly in the Business (21 AIOs, 22 links), Technology (8 AIOs, 8 links), and Self-Care and Wellness (6 AIOs, 6 links) niches.

The Forums & Social Media group is led by:

• Wikipedia.org (18 niches out of 20). Wikipedia shows significant appearances in many niches, with the highest in Entertainment and Hobbies (99 AIOs, 151 links), Food and Beverage (114 AIOs, 122 links), and Relationships (121 AIOs, 125 links).
• Youtube.com (17 niches out of 20). YouTube demonstrates a dominant role in Food and Beverage (195 AIOs, 292 links), Self-Care and Wellness (185 AIOs, 283 links), and Technology (168 AIOs, 231 links).
• Linkedin.com (15 niches out of 20). LinkedIn has a very high number of AIOs and links in Relationships (378 AIOs, 478 links) and Business (193 AIOs, 234 links). 

Websites like Reddit, Quora, and Stackoverflow, which we attributed to this group, show zero presence. 

For a detailed breakdown of each website by niches, check out this file.

Do the analyzed websites appear in both AI Overviews and TOP 10 organic search results?

The top-performing websites mentioned in the previous section continue to dominate the number of keywords with links, appearing in both AIOs and the TOP 10 organic search results:

• Media outlets:

1. Forbes has the highest count with 562 keywords
2. Business Insider follows with 49 keywords
3. Washington Post takes third, with 20 keywords
4. The Guardian has 13 keywords

• Forums & Social Media group:

1. Wikipedia leads with 426 keywords
2. LinkedIn shows a strong performance with 212 keywords
3. YouTube follows with 118 keywords

Overall, for a quarter of the analyzed websites, including 9to5Google, Quora, Reddit, Search Engine Land, and Stack Overflow, no keywords trigger the SERPs with matching links between AIOs and the top 10 organic search results.

Do the analyzed websites appear in both AI Overviews and featured snippets?

There is 1 top-performing website in the media outlets group:

• Forbes.com: 33 keywords with links in both AIOs and featured snippets

Business Insider and Inc were both linked in AI Overviews and featured snippets, by 2 and 1 keywords, respectively. Most of the analyzed media (15 websites) didn’t appear in both AIOs and featured snippets.

The Forums & Social Media group shows a relatively higher performance:

• Wikipedia: 55 keywords with links in both AIOs and featured snippets
• LinkedIn: 17 keywords with links in both AIOs and featured snippets
• YouTube: 5 keywords with links in both AIOs and featured snippets

How often do AI Overviews link to .gov websites?

Government websites are often considered authoritative sources of information. We observed them closely to determine how frequently Google’s AI Overviews incorporate them in answers. Note that we only focused on the .gov website for the US.

Out of 7,475 keywords triggering AIOs, 1,473 keywords (19.71%) resulted in AIOs with links to .gov websites. This means nearly one in five AI Overviews references a government source.

Out of 51,745 links discovered during this research, 1,808 links (3.49%) went to .gov websites.

Important note: The data below is shown in percentages only. We calculated it based on a small number of keywords. However, percentages offer the clearest comparison for this context.

For distribution by niche, we see that the Healthcare niche has the highest percentage of both keywords triggering AIOs with links to .gov domains (60.71%) and links in this niche to .gov sites (29.81% of its total links). 

Niches heavily regulated by the government also show high percentages:

• Insurance: 35.87% of keywords, 10.48% of links
• Career and Jobs: 31.25% of keywords, 8.11% of links
• Legal: 25% of keywords, 4.69% of links

The Relationships niche has a high percentage too (37.40% of keywords, 6.30% of links), possibly due to government resources on family services or social programs.

With 23.16% of keywords and 3.97% of links, Food and Beverage likely references FDA or USDA guidelines frequently.

Some niches show very low or no .gov presence:

• Real Estate and Ecommerce: 0% for both metrics
• Education (surprisingly low!): 0.58% of keywords and 0.08% of links
• Business: 2.15% of keywords and 0.31% of links

How often do AI Overviews link to .edu websites?

Our research reveals that out of 7,475 keywords triggering AIOs, 1,989 keywords (26.61%) result in AIOs containing links to .edu websites. This suggests that over a quarter of Google’s AI-generated responses reference educational institutions or academic resources.

Out of the total 51,745 links discovered during this research, 2,497 links (4.85%) direct users to .edu websites.

Important note: We present data only in percentage form based on a small sample of keywords. While the sample size is small, percentages offer the most accurate basis for comparison.

The distribution of .edu links across different niches varies considerably:

• Real Estate: 11.63% keywords, 11.63% links
• Relationships: 47.16% keywords, 8.47% links 
• Legal: 43.75% keywords, 7.29% links
• Healthcare: 32.14% keywords, 6.21% links.

Most other niches have between 1-5% of their total AIO links pointing to .edu sites, including the Education niche. Only 4.80% of its links go to the .edu websites.

Finance shows the lowest percentage (0.10%) among niches with any .edu links.

How often do AI Overviews link to .mil websites?

AIOs include links to .mil websites on occasion, but less frequently than educational sources. Our research shows that out of 7,475 keywords triggering AIOs, only 440 keywords (5.89%) result in AIOs containing links to .mil websites.

Of the 51,745 links discovered during this research, 441 links (0.85%) direct users to .mil websites. 

Important note: Results are presented as percentages based on a select group of keywords. Despite the limited scope, this method offers the clearest comparative data view.

The distribution of .mil links across different niches is highly concentrated:

• The Relationships niche shows the highest prevalence of .mil links, with 21.56% of its keywords triggering AIOs with .mil links. Moreover, 2.97% of all links in this niche’s AIOs go to .mil websites. This might indicate that military resources are considered relevant for relationship-related topics, possibly due to content about military families or relationships in military contexts.
• Healthcare is the second most prominent niche for .mil links, with 3.57% of its keywords triggering AIOs with .mil links and 1.24% of its total AIO links going to .mil websites. 
• Technology shows a minimal presence of .mil links, with only 0.24% of its keywords triggering AIOs with .mil links and a mere 0.03% of its total AIO links going to .mil websites. 
• No other niche in our study showed keywords triggering AIOs with links to .mil websites.

How often do AI Overviews link to .in domains?

Lily Ray has been vocal about the issues surrounding Google’s AI Overviews, particularly concerning the inclusion of non-US and Indian websites featured in AIOs.

We decided to check how many keywords from our sample would trigger AI Overviews with links to .in domains. 

Out of 7,475 keywords triggering AIOs, 736 keywords (9.85%) trigger SERPs with AIOs linking to .in websites. This is a moderate but notable presence for the US SERPs.

As for link count, of the 51,745 links discovered during our research, 880 links (1.70%) go to .in websites.

Important note: We calculated percentages based on a small sample of keywords. Still, this approach best captures comparative ratios.

The Sports and Exercise niche leads in both keywords triggering AIOs, with links to .in domains (36.83% of keywords) and links in this niche that go to .in websites (6.48% of links out of the niche’s total number of links).

Other leaders are:

• Food and Beverage: 18.49% of keywords, 3.60% of total niche links 
• Fashion and Beauty: 16.67% of keywords, 2.15% of total niche links
• Insurance: 13.04% of keywords, 2.86% of total niche links
• Business: 8.56% of keywords, 1.27% of total niche links

Niches like Real Estate, Career and Jobs, Ecommerce and Retail, and News and Politics show zero keywords and links to .in domains.

Do AI Overviews contain links to HTTP websites?

AIOs overwhelmingly favor secure HTTPS links over unsecured HTTP links. Out of the 51,745 links discovered in our research, only 130 links (0.25%) use the HTTP protocol. 51,615 links (99.75%) use the secure HTTPS protocol.

The distribution of HTTP vs. HTTPS links across niches reveals:

• Real Estate, Career and Jobs, Fashion and Beauty, Finance, Legal, and Pets show 100% HTTPS usage with no HTTP links.
• All other niches show near-complete HTTPS adoption.
• Education shows the highest percentage of HTTP links at 1.39%, though this is still very low.

Research methodology

This study was specifically designed to analyze the links and sources in Google’s AI Overviews. Our goal was to provide SEO specialists and website owners with insights and facilitate better-informed business and SEO decisions. Importantly, for this study, we used accounts without Google Labs when collecting data to ensure a more current view of AI-powered search.

Scope and data set 

Our analysis covered 100,013 keywords across 20 niches:

1. Business
2. Career and Jobs
3. Cars
4. Ecommerce and Retail
5. Education
6. Entertainment and Hobbies
7. Fashion and Beauty
8. Finance
9. Food and Beverage
10. Healthcare
11. Insurance
12. Legal
13. News and Politics
14. Pets
15. Real Estate
16. Relationships
17. Self-Care and Wellness
18. Sports and Exercise
19. Technology
20. Travel

Each niche consisted of approximately 5,000 keywords with different search intents, volumes, and word counts (including short, medium, and long-tail keywords). 

Technological framework

We created projects for each niche within the SE Ranking platform and used its AI Overview tracking functionality to capture and analyze how AI-generated answers integrate links from various sources in search results. We also used: 

• Competitive Research Tool to collect organic keywords, organic traffic, and domain trust data
• Backlink Checker Tool to collect referring domains and backlinks.
• Website Audit tool to collect domain age data. 

Parameters of the study

• Search Engine: Google
• Location: USA
• Region: New York, New York, United States
• Language: English (en)

Data collection configuration

We collected the data using Google Chrome on an Ubuntu PC. Sessions were conducted through Google accounts without Google Labs based in New York. All personalization features within the accounts were also disabled to eliminate any potential biases and maintain data integrity.

Execution timeline

We collected this data during a one-time check on July 11, 2024.

Conclusion and next steps

The results of this research have once again highlighted that AI-powered search optimization requires a holistic approach and continuous improvement of E-E-A-T. 

We see that websites that get links in AI Overviews have built their authority over the years, but newer sites also have a chance to get their share of visibility in the new search if they offer unique perspectives and have robust backlink profiles. The main thing is to constantly monitor changes and respond to them in time. Our new AI Overviews Tracker tool can help with that! Sign up for the waitlist to get early access to the tool and start optimizing your website for AIOs before your competitors do.

Stay tuned for our next research study. We plan to release another one soon.

Written by

Yevheniia Khromova

Yevheniia is a content marketer and copywriter at SE Ranking. She is a fan of SEO, digital marketing, and content creation. Yevheniia believes simplicity is key as it helps reduce the clutter in our heads and focus on what matters. This is the principle she uses in her writing. She also enjoys cooking, learning new spices and flavors, traveling, and playing board games.